Skip to content
Contact Us
All answers

ANSWER

Is it cheaper to build your own software than to keep paying for SaaS?

UPDATED
2026-04-30
SECTIONS
#answer #results #follow-up

SHORT ANSWER

The short answer, with operator context.

Start here. The longer context and related questions follow below.

ANSWER
Sometimes - but rarely at the price the first spreadsheet shows. Practitioner consensus puts the true cost of owned software at a multiple of the naive build estimate once maintenance, dependency updates, and ownership staffing are priced over five years. AI-assisted development cut the cost of the first draft, not the cost of the years after it.
BEST FIT
CFOs and CTOs pricing an internal build against subscription fees.
RECOMMENDED START
Build vs. Buy decision guide

RELEVANT RESULTS

Outcomes that inform this answer.

Selected results from related operator-led work.

  • 22% EBITDA margins maintained through 4x revenue growth

    RESULTS View results
  • Diagnostics priced flat - the recommendation carries no build upside

    RESULTS View results

NEXT QUESTIONS

What to ask next.

Each follow-up question opens the next issue and points to a relevant page.

What costs do build-vs-buy spreadsheets usually miss?

Years two through five: maintenance and refresh, dependency and security updates, the salary of the named owner, and the risk cost of that owner leaving. The build is usually the cheap part.

RELATED PAGE Total Cost of Ownership

Does the best-documented insourcing case show cost savings?

No - and that is the honest base rate. Norway's NAV brought 100+ systems in-house successfully, but peer-reviewed researchers could not find clear evidence of the projected savings. The benefits that materialized were ownership, speed, and quality.

RELATED PAGE What Klarna Actually Did

Turn the answer into an operating plan

A 14-day diagnostic converts the question into owners, cadence, and board-ready decisions.

Request a Turnaround Assessment