In 2021, you could hand a prospective buyer a CIM (Confidential Information Memorandum) with a 50% EBITDA bridge, claiming that "future synergies" and "CEO distraction" were valid adjustments. The market was frothy, debt was cheap, and diligence was loose. Those days are dead.
In 2026, the Quality of Earnings (QofE) report is where deals go to die. Lenders have tightened covenants, and investment committees are scrutinizing every dollar of "pro forma" profit. According to S&P Global Ratings, aggressive add-backs remain elevated—averaging 29.4% of management-adjusted EBITDA—but the rejection rate during diligence has skyrocketed. For B-rated companies, aggressive add-backs led to a leverage miss of 2.6 turns higher than projected.
For Operating Partners and CFOs, this creates a binary outcome: present defensible, data-backed adjustments and get full credit, or present "fluff" and lose credibility instantly. Once a buyer finds two or three indefensible add-backs, they assume the entire P&L is manipulated. The multiple compresses, or worse, the deal trades.
We have audited hundreds of EBITDA bridges. Below is the diagnostic list of 15 add-backs that sophisticated PE firms will actually accept—and the documentation you need to prove them.

These are adjustments based on factual mispricing of market roles or non-business expenses. If documented, they clear QofE 95% of the time.
These are valid but attract scrutiny. You must prove they are truly non-recurring.
Use these sparingly. Buyers will often cap these or require an earn-out to pay for them.
The difference between a 7x and a 10x exit often comes down to the credibility of your EBITDA bridge. When preparing your Revenue Quality Audit, follow the "Receipts Rule." If you cannot produce a third-party document (invoice, contract, board resolution) validating the adjustment, leave it off.
Buyers are now applying a discount rate to the add-back schedule. If your add-backs constitute more than 20% of your total Adjusted EBITDA, expect a "haircut" on valuation. For example, if you claim $2M in add-backs on $10M EBITDA, a buyer might only underwrite 50% of those adjustments, effectively valuing you at $9M EBITDA. This is why calculating real EBITDA add-backs is critical before you go to market.
If you are 12 months out from an exit, start "cleaning the books" now. Stop running personal expenses through the business. Standardize your rent. Execute your RIFs early so the savings are in the TTM (Trailing Twelve Months) rather than a pro-forma adjustment. As outlined in our PE Exit Readiness Checklist, clean financials command a premium because they lower the buyer's perceived risk.
Ultimately, PE firms will accept add-backs that represent the future cash flow potential of the asset in their hands. They will reject anything that smells like a founder trying to retroactively fix a low-margin year.
