You have stress-tested the revenue model. You have audited the customer concentration. You have grilled the VP of Sales on their pipeline coverage. But for the asset that actually generates the revenue—the software itself—you are flying blind.
In 2025, the standard "check-the-box" IT due diligence is negligence. A CIO interview and a self-reported questionnaire do not reveal the rotting infrastructure that will cost you $3M to replatform in Year 1. I have sat in board meetings where an Operating Partner realizes, six months post-close, that the "proprietary AI platform" they just bought is actually a tangled web of GPL-licensed open source libraries that they legally cannot monetize.
The data confirms the danger. According to Synopsys' latest Open Source Security and Risk Analysis, 74% of commercial codebases contain high-risk vulnerabilities—a massive surge from previous years. Yet, McKinsey reports that companies performing deep technical due diligence are 2.8x more likely to achieve a successful exit.
This is not about code aesthetics. This is about EBITDA preservation. Every line of bad code is a future liability on your P&L. If you don't price it in before the LOI is signed, you will pay for it out of your value creation budget later.

Stop asking generic questions like "Is the code good?" and start asking specific, evidentiary questions that impact valuation. Use this checklist to uncover the truth.
This is where the biggest liabilities hide. You need to know if you actually own the IP you are buying.
Can this platform actually handle the 3x growth your investment thesis demands?
Software is built by people. If the people leave, does the IP leave with them?
The goal of this checklist isn't just to kill deals—it's to price them accurately. When you find that the target has $2M of necessary security remediation, you don't walk away. You adjust the purchase price or structure a holdback.
We recently advised a PE firm looking at a logistics SaaS platform. Our audit revealed that 40% of their core library was deprecated and unsupported. The cost to modernize was estimated at $1.5M over 18 months. The firm didn't kill the deal. They used our report to lower the purchase price by $2M and mandated a Technical Debt Paydown Plan in the first 100 days.
Walk away or re-trade aggressively if you see:
Your job as an Operating Partner is to de-risk the asset. Technical debt is financial debt. Treat it with the same rigor you apply to the balance sheet.
