For the better part of a decade, the instruction manual for Series B and C founders was simple: burn cash to buy growth. If you spent $2 million on Sales and Marketing (S&M) to generate $1 million in Net New ARR, nobody blinked. The valuation markets rewarded top-line velocity, and efficiency was a problem for "future you."
That future has arrived, and it brought a calculator.
In 2025, the market has shifted from rewarding raw growth to rewarding efficient growth. We see this in the collapse of revenue multiples for high-burn companies and the stabilization of the "Rule of 40." For founders like "Scaling Sarah"—stuck on a revenue plateau while costs balloon—the most critical question isn't "how do we grow faster?" It's "is our growth engine actually broken?"
The diagnostic tool for this specific problem is the SaaS Magic Number. Unlike CAC Payback (which looks at individual unit economics) or LTV/CAC (which relies on shaky 5-year retention assumptions), the Magic Number is a real-time pulse check on your entire Go-To-Market (GTM) machine. It tells you exactly how much Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) you create for every $1.00 of Sales and Marketing expense.
If you don't know this number, you are flying blind. If you do know it, and it's below 0.75, you are likely burning equity faster than you are building value. Here is how to calculate it, benchmark it, and fix it.

The beauty of the Magic Number is its brutality. It doesn't care about your "strategic brand awareness" campaigns or your "pipeline coverage." It only cares about dollars in vs. dollars out.
While the original definition used GAAP revenue, most operators and PE firms run this calculation using ARR for a clearer operational view:
Magic Number = (Current Qtr ARR - Previous Qtr ARR) × 4 / Previous Qtr S&M Expense
The Logic: You take the net growth in ARR from the quarter, annualize it (multiply by 4), and divide it by what you spent on Sales and Marketing the previous quarter to generate that growth. (Note: Using the previous quarter's spend accounts for the typical sales cycle lag).
According to Scale Venture Partners and recent 2025 data, the bar for efficiency has bifurcated. AI-native companies are setting new records, while traditional SaaS firms struggle to hold the line.
It is worth noting that Private Equity (PE) backed firms often target a Magic Number above 1.2, achieved not just by growing faster, but by ruthlessly cutting unproductive marketing spend. Conversely, ICONIQ Growth's 2025 report highlights that "AI-native" companies are achieving Magic Numbers well above 1.5 due to leaner headcounts and product-led growth (PLG) motions.
The standard formula uses Net New ARR. This means high churn can mask good sales performance. If your sales team added $2M in new bookings, but you lost $1.5M in churn, your Net New is only $0.5M. Your Magic Number will plummet, making it look like a sales problem when it is actually a Customer Success problem. Always calculate a "Gross Magic Number" (using Gross New ARR) alongside the Net version to isolate the issue.
Calculating the number is 5% of the work. The other 95% is the operational response. If you are a "Scaling Sarah" dealing with a Magic Number below 0.75, you cannot simply "push harder." You must re-engineer the machine.
The Diagnosis: Your GTM motion is fundamentally broken. You are likely staffing a heavy enterprise sales team to sell a product with SMB price points, or your marketing CAC is out of control.
The Action Plan:
The Diagnosis: You have product-market fit, but your friction costs are too high. This is common in Series B companies where "founder heroics" have been replaced by average sales reps who lack the founder's closing ability.
The Action Plan:
The Diagnosis: You are leaving money on the table. You have a verified machine that turns $1 into $1.20+. Investors will punish you for not growing faster in this scenario.
The Action Plan:
The SaaS Magic Number is the ultimate arbiter of your GTM strategy. It removes emotion from the budgeting process. If the number is low, no amount of narrative will fix it—only operational surgery will. In 2025, efficiency is not just a metric; it is the primary condition for survival.
