Contact Us
Migration & IntegrationFor Portfolio Paul3 min

The 'Who Decides?' Trap: A RACI Matrix That Actually Unblocks Integration

Stop decision latency in your portfolio companies. A field-tested RACI matrix template for post-merger IT integration that clears bottlenecks and accelerates EBITDA realization.

By
Justin Leader
Industry
Private Equity
Function
IT Operations
Filed
January 12, 2026

The High Cost of "Let's Circle Back"

You’ve seen the playbook before. The deal closes. The 100-Day Plan looks pristine in PowerPoint. Then, week four hits. The Steering Committee meets, and instead of decisions, you get updates. The IT integration lead is waiting on the CFO for budget approval, the CFO is waiting on the CISO for a risk assessment, and the CISO is waiting on a vendor who doesn't know who their point of contact is anymore.

This isn't an execution problem; it's a governance failure. In Private Equity, time isn't just money—it's IRR. McKinsey analysis suggests that up to 50% of anticipated deal value is lost due to slow or ineffective integration. The culprit is rarely technical incompetence. It is almost always decision latency—the time lag between identifying a problem and making the call to fix it.

Most portfolio companies try to solve this with more meetings. They create "integration councils" and "working groups" that function as massive, consensus-driven bottlenecks. They confuse being informed with having veto power. To protect your multiple, you need to strip the governance model down to its studs. You don't need a "collaborative culture" during the first 100 days; you need a dictatorship of competence.

The Private Equity IT Integration RACI Template

Standard RACI matrices (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) fail in M&A because they are too democratic. In a turnaround or high-velocity integration, the "Consulted" column is where momentum goes to die. If you have more than two people in the 'C' column for a critical decision, you have already missed your timeline.

Here is the simplified governance model we deploy to unblock technical integrations in buy-and-build scenarios.

The Roles

  • Steering Committee (SteerCo): The Operating Partner (You) and the PortCo CEO. They define the What and the When. They do not debate the How.
  • Integration Management Office (IMO): The Program Lead. They hold the pen on the plan. Their job is to identify collisions between workstreams.
  • Workstream Lead (WSL): The functional head (e.g., VP of Engineering, CIO). They own the execution.

The Matrix

Decision / ActivitySteerCo (PE/CEO)IMO LeadIT Workstream LeadCFO / Finance
Synergy Target DefinitionA (Accountable)CCR (Responsible)
Integration Budget ApprovalARCR
ERP/CRM SelectionI (Informed)CAC
Staffing / Headcount ReductionsARCC
Go-Live Decision (Go/No-Go)IARI
Security Risk AcceptanceICAI

Notice the deliberate lack of 'C's. The SteerCo is Informed on the ERP selection, not Consulted. Why? Because if you, the Operating Partner, are debating SAP vs. NetSuite, you are too deep in the weeds. If the CIO can't pick the right ERP, swap the CIO. Don't do their job for them.

The "Consulted" Trap: Where Synergies Die

The single biggest mistake I see in post-merger integrations is treating the 'C' (Consulted) as a 'V' (Veto). In a polite corporate culture, 'Consulted' implies that the person must agree before you can proceed. In a PE-backed integration, 'Consulted' means: "I will ask for your input because you have specific domain knowledge. I am under no obligation to use it, and if you don't respond by close of business Tuesday, I am moving on."

To enforce this, we implement the "Disgaree and Commit" rule. The IMO Lead has the authority to break ties. If the Sales VP wants Salesforce and the Service VP wants Zendesk, and they can't agree within 48 hours, the IMO decides. The decision is final. The cost of a suboptimal software choice is often lower than the cost of a three-month delay.

Defining the 'Accountable' One

There can never be two 'A's. Never. "Co-leads" are a lie we tell ourselves to avoid hurting feelings. If the row for "Data Migration" has both the Legacy CTO and the Acquiring CIO as Accountable, the migration will fail. One neck to choke. Usually, the acquiring CIO is the 'A', and the legacy CTO is a heavily leveraged 'R' or 'C'. If the legacy CTO blocks progress, refer to the Founder Extraction playbook.

Speed is the primary synergy. Your RACI matrix isn't just a document; it's a permission slip for your leaders to move fast without looking over their shoulders.

Continue the operating path
Topic hub Migration & Integration Post-merger integrations that hold customer and staff retention. 95% / 100% achieved on complex divestitures. Pillar Turnaround & Restructuring Integrations fail when they're run as status meetings. We run them as Integration Management Offices that own outcomes — the difference shows up in retention numbers. Service Transaction Advisory Services Operator-led buy-side and sell-side diligence for technology middle-market deals. Financial rigor, technical diligence, and integration risk in one workstream. Service Transaction Execution Services Integration management, carve-outs, system consolidation, and post-close execution for technology acquisitions that must turn thesis into EBITDA. Service Turnaround & Restructuring Services Crisis intervention, runway extension, project recovery, technical rescue, and restructuring support for technology middle-market firms.
Related intelligence
Sources
  1. McKinsey & Company: Perspectives on Merger Integration
  2. Deloitte: Accelerating IT Synergies Capture
  3. BCG: Capturing Value from Synergy in PMI
Move on this

A 14-day operator-led diagnostic, before the gap is priced into your multiple.

No retainer until we agree on the work.

Request a Turnaround Assessment →